Trump News

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

NY State Judge Finds Trump Organizations Repeatedly Provided Fraudulent Valuations To Lenders and Insurers



In a civil lawsuit brought by NY Attorney General Letitia James, a state court judge has found that various Trump entities engaged in repeated fraud as to business and property valuations in order to obtain loans. A copy of the full Order is at the bottom of this post.

The court found that a trial was not needed on that issue, as the contemporaneous documents showed that for numerous properties Trump obtained his own valuations that varied dramatically from what he represented to the banks. Under the NY law at issue, intent do defraud was not necessary, only that false statements and representations were made. The court rejected Trump’s defense that the independent valuations he obtained were irrelevant, since Trump purchasing a property made it more valuable. The court also rejected the notion that never missing a payment to a lender or failing to pay off a loan vindicated the valuations, finding that the fraud took place when the valuations were given, and what happened afterwards with regard to payment was legally irrelevant.

The court rejected Trump’s numerous legal defenses, finding many of them frivolous and abusive since the defenses already were rejected by an appeals court, yet repeated like “Groundhog Day” in the trial court again. The court sanctioned Trump’s lawyers for that conduct.

[clip]

What is unclear is what this means for the numerous entities that make up what we popularly refer to as “the Trump organization.” I haven’t been able to sort if out myself, and have seen mostly the type of gloating and hyperbole we saw during the Russia collusion investigation about the end being near. The NY Times seems to have a fairly reasoned explanation:

While the trial will determine the size of the penalty, Justice Engoron’s ruling granted one of the biggest punishments Ms. James sought: the cancellation of business certificates that allow some of Mr. Trump’s New York properties to operate, a move that could have major repercussions for the Trump family business.
The decision will not dissolve Mr. Trump’s entire company, but it sought to terminate his control over a flagship commercial property at 40 Wall Street in Lower Manhattan and a family estate in Westchester County. Mr. Trump might also lose control over his other New York properties, including Trump Tower in Midtown Manhattan, though that will likely be fought over in coming months.
Justice Engoron’s decision narrows the issues that will be heard at trial, deciding that the core of Ms. James’s case was valid.

If I find better analysis of what this all means, I’ll add it.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
In a 35-page ruling, Engoron sided with James, who argued that Trump made several indisputably false statements in business documents to secure favorable terms with banks – including by claiming that his soaring triplex penthouse at Trump Tower was 30,000 square feet when it was in fact closer to 11,000 feet.

“A discrepancy of this order of magnitude, by a real estate developer sizing up his own living space of decades, can only be considered fraud,” Engoron wrote.

The judge revoked the New York “business certificates” belonging to the Trump Organization and any other New York-based business run by Trump or his family – while ordering that an independent third party will be tasked with “managing the dissolution of the cancelled LLCs.”

It means Trump could be stripped of control over some of his namesake properties — including Trump Tower in Midtown.

“The widespread, radical attack against me, my family and my supporters have now devolved to new, un-American depths,” Trump ranted on Truth Social Tuesday night, calling Engoron “deranged” and James a “completely biased and corrupt ‘prosecutor.’”

“We are rapidly becoming a communist country, and my civil rights have been taken away from me,” he continued.

“This is Democrat political lawfare and a witch hunt at a level never seen before.”

Trump plans to appeal the decision, his attorneys said.

“Today’s outrageous decision is completely disconnected from the facts and governing law,” Christopher Kise, a lawyer for Trump, said in a statement. “President Trump and his family will seek all available appellate remedies to rectify this miscarriage of justice.”

Trump’s effort to get the court to dismiss James’ fraud and other claims — including by arguing that the statute of limitations on them had run out — was also denied in Tuesday’s ruling.



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
🔥 Yesterday, the Associated Press breathlessly reported on the first court decision against President Trump, in a story headlined “Judge rules Donald Trump defrauded banks, insurers while building real estate empire.

Ruling in a civil lawsuit brought by woke, Soros-funded New York Attorney General Letitia James, New York state judge Arthur Engoron found that Trump and his company had “deceived” banks, insurers and others by “massively overvaluing” his assets and “exaggerating his net worth” on applications and financial statements used while making real-estate deals and securing bank loans.

The first thing to understand about the decision is that no one was harmed. Trump paid all his loans back in full, on time. Letitia’s case is only about what Trump put down on the financial statements that were provided to extremely sophisticated financial professionals who didn’t rely on them. Letitia and Judge Engoran relied on a goofy New York law criminalizing “falsifying” financial documents — a unique law that doesn’t require even one single victim.

That’s bad enough. But it gets a LOT worse.


This case is right in my wheelhouse; I’ll explain the whole thing. It’s not complicated. The judge’s 35-page decision is, at bottom, only about how President Trump valued his real estate holdings when he was providing his personal financial statement to various people. I am qualified to comment because half of my commercial litigation cases are disputes over real estate. Before tumbling into constitutional and civil rights law, I also had a strong side practice in commercial loan workouts — negotiating for developers with banks — and commercial Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which (at least in Florida) is all about valuing real estate.

Principle number one: Real estate valuation is not a science because values are subjective. Every effort to value real estate is just a guess at what someone will eventually be willing to pay for the land. Your dilapidated barn might be someone else’s castle.

Real estate — buildings and land — is worth different amounts to different people. A thousand acres of inexpensive pine forest zoned only for agricultural use could be worth a whole lot more to a developer who’s confident he can get a zoning change. It’s not nefarious. Maybe that developer also owns a half-acre parcel downtown somewhere that the County has long wanted for a park, so he knows he has something to trade the commissioners for rezoning the pine forest to residential.


That hypothetical developer would pay a lot more for the thousand acres than anyone else. So what’s the property worth? The price to everyone else or the “highest and best use?”

But legal disputes must be resolved and you have to start somewhere. Lawyers think about real estate values in three general categories, depending on who is doing the valuing. From lowest value to highest, the normal categories are: the tax appraised value (the lowest, and least likely to be accurate), the “forced liquidation” value (think foreclosure sale), and then the highest, the “market” value (determined by professional appraisers who assume that the seller can market the property without pressure or time constraints).

Even professional appraisers disagree on land value.
Every single one of my cases involves competing appraisals, and the appraisers’ numbers are often wildly different. Lawyers and judges all know that appraisals are just guesses. When I negotiate with bank lawyers, I often offer to bet them a month’s salary that when the appraised property finally sells, it will bring a price at least 15% different than the bank’s appraisal. In all these years, no opposing lawyer has ever taken that bet.

A fourth category of valuation is the owner’s opinion of his property’s value. Even though an owner might not be a real estate expert, the law considers the owner well positioned to know the value of their own property. They probably think about it a lot. They know all the pro’s and con’s.

Therefore under the law, an owner’s opinion is admissible evidence of value.


The lowest valuation is usually the tax appraised value, which is the amount used by the state to calculate annual property taxes. There’s a good reason why it’s the lowest: tax appraisers calculations are limited in many ways under state law. For example, in Florida tax appraisers can’t increase the value of homestead property — where someone lives — more than a few percentage points at a time. Tax appraisers also can only change the assessment when certain things happen, like when a property is sold.

Judge Engoran ruled yesterday that Trump had “inflated” his property values on his financial statements. Meaning, the judge decided what the properties were worth and then found that Trump overestimated Trump’s values — on paper. Take for example Trump’s residence, Mar-a-Lago, which the judge determined was worth $18 million for the entire ten-year period between 2011 and 2021.

That determination was based only on the county tax assessor, who appraised its value between $18 and $27 million. So of course the Judge used the lowest number in that range, $18 million, comparing that to Trump’s value of between $426 million and $612 million:


image 7.png

Nobody would use the tax appraiser’s value to guess at Mar-a-Lago’s selling price. Nobody. Here’s what Forbes recently said in a highly-critical article about Trump and the case:


image.png
So Forbes estimated Mar-a-Lago’s value between $200 million and $725 million, based on broker opinions, and ultimately went with “a conservative” $350 million. Mar-a-Lago is spectacular, historic, all-stone, luxury oceanfront property that looks like a castle and is the size of a small hotel. For comparison, a 5-bedroom home recently sold in the same neighborhood for $75 million.
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https://substack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com/public/images/8aee0661-7320-4553-ac10-958048deb00b_2048x1365.webp

The $18 million value is a joke. Except nobody’s laughing.

And it gets even worse. All of Trump’s financial statements — again, provided to sophisticated financial professionals — included a prominent disclaimer saying that actual real estate values could be wildly different than what was put down.The judge even reprinted the disclaimer in full in his opinion:

image 10.png
But Judge Engoran breezily waved the disclaimer aside, in essence holding that Trump should have known better anyway. The judge then went through all Trump’s other LLCs and properties and applied the same logic, finding Trump’s guesses at the value of his real estate were “false.”

The practical effect, as I read the order, is that the judge has ordered Trump to stop doing business in New York, and ordered Trump’s properties to be fire-sold under a court-appointed receiver. Again — even though nobody was harmed.

I assume President Trump’s lawyers will appeal this awful decision. Stay tuned.




 
Last edited:

stgislander

Well-Known Member
PREMO Member
Boy... I hope when I sell my place in Tall Timbers in a couple years, the value is based on the real estate estimates and not county tax assessments.
 
Last edited:

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Cassidy Hutchinson's Book Claims Fall Apart After Man in Story Speaks Out



In her new book “Enough” Hutchinson said that Meadows consumed the first beverage in front of White House budget director Russ Vought, who she claimed is a “faithful Mormon.”

When Hutchinson asked Meadows how much he drank, Meadows said that he was halfway through one and counted three others that he had just finished, meaning he drank 3.5 cans of White Claw.

Hutchison then claimed that Vought said to Meadows, “I know times are hard now, but are they really that bad,” which queued Meadows into the fact that he was drinking alcohol by mistake.

This is a funny and lighthearted story, but there is just one major problem — none of it appears to be true.






 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Prosecutors pointed to the moment, as well as the former president’s recent attacks on departing Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Mark Milley, in asking a federal judge to place more restrictions on Trump, particularly on what he can say, as he awaits trial in Washington, DC, on federal charges of 2020 election interference.

“The defendant either purchased a gun in violation of the law and his conditions of release, or seeks to benefit from his supporters’ mistaken belief that he did so,” the prosecutors wrote on Friday. “It would be a separate federal crime, and thus a violation of the defendant’s conditions of release, for him to purchase a gun while this felony indictment is pending.”

The prosecutors note that Trump re-posted a video asserting he bought the weapon, and that a video shows him with the gun.

“The defendant should not be permitted to obtain the benefits of his incendiary public statements and then avoid accountability by having others—whose messages he knows will receive markedly less attention than his own—feign retraction,” the prosecutors argue.

The gun discussion catching prosecutors’ attention doesn’t mean Trump will be charged with any additional crimes. Yet if the judge were to look into violations of his release and find he broke his bail terms, Trump could face consequences including having to await his trial in jail.


Prosecutors raise Trump’s recent attacks on Milley

In the filing, prosecutors say Trump continues to make remarks that could hurt the integrity of his trial, including in how he has recently attacked Milley.

Prosecutors told the judge in their filing they believe Trump suggested Milley committed treason and should be executed, in a social media post Trump made on September 22.

“This is an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH,” the former president had written about Milley speaking with a Chinese general near the end of Trump’s term, the prosecutors noted.

The judge is set to consider the prosecutors’ request for a limited gag order at a hearing October 16.

Trump’s team opposes the request, arguing in a court filing earlier this week that the proposed order is unconstitutional, overly broad and an effort to censor the former president during the 2024 presidential race.

The Milley comment is just one of several recent remarks from Trump that prosecutors are using to further their arguments for speech restrictions to protect possible jurors’ perceptions of witnesses and others involved in the case against Trump.


 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

The horrible NY ruling against Trump and the horrible judge who issued it

By Andrea Widburg


It was a given when a judge ruled against Donald Trump on the suit that New York State Attorney General Letitia James filed, alleging that Trump defrauded banks to obtain loans. The ruling revealed two interesting and important things about how leftists and their fellow travelers use the legal system and about the ideological corruption of leftist judges.

It goes without saying that the verdict was a joke. The claim was that Trump lied to lenders to get better loan terms. Interestingly, none of the lenders complained, and Trump paid back every penny. More than that, commercial lenders have a due diligence responsibility, meaning they’re supposed to do their own valuations before lending millions of dollars. At Trump’s level, lying is virtually impossible.

Still, it should have been a big story: A judge claims Trump committed fraud and banned him from conducting business in New York, the state where most of the properties Trump developed exist. You’d think that this would have been news fodder for days. I mean, this is the ex-president (or, for some of us, the current president) and one who, before his presidency, was New York’s biggest and most famous real estate maven. And yet, if you paid attention to the news, the coverage was de minimis.

The silence means a couple of things: First, it shows that the decision was timed to be a temporary distraction from the now-impossible-to-ignore news about Joe Biden’s selling out American interests for profit. And if anyone is wondering, what Biden did was worse than what Spiro Agnew did when he was Vice President. Agnew engaged in age-old graft. Based on all the information available, Biden literally sold his own country down the river to line his pockets.




more meat about the judge at the link
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Prosecutors raise Trump’s recent attacks on Milley

In the filing, prosecutors say Trump continues to make remarks that could hurt the integrity of his trial, including in how he has recently attacked Milley.

Prosecutors told the judge in their filing they believe Trump suggested Milley committed treason and should be executed, in a social media post Trump made on September 22.












 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Victor Davis Hanson: Hamas in ‘No Way’ Would Have Invaded Israel under Trump




Speaking on former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia John Anderson’s “Conversations” podcast Wednesday, Dr. Hanson suggested that “to his credit,” former President Donald Trump demonstrated American deterrence and determination through his assassination of Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani and destruction of the Islamist terror group ISIS.

In response, “Iran did not do anything,” and “there would be no way Hamas was doing this between 2017 and January of 2021,” he argued. “They had a small war, but they never did anything like this.”

According to Hanson, additional countries would have also been deterred under a Trump presidency.

“I don’t think Vladimir Putin would have gone into Ukraine, and I don’t think that China would have sent a balloon,” he said, attributing that to Trump’s reputation for being “unpredictable” and the nations’ conviction it would be a “dangerous thing” to tempt the United States.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

A Who’s Who Of The ‘Get Trump’ Crusade



Alvin Bragg​

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg was the first prosecutor to land the coveted indictment of Democrats’ Public Enemy No. 1. In April, the New York prosecutor unveiled a 34-count indictment against Trump, carrying a maximum 136-year prison sentence. The charges stem from 2016 hush-money payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels in a case prosecutors previously declined to pursue.

The Manhattan charges, however, marked the fulfillment of a campaign promise Bragg made two years ago to prosecute the former president. Prosecuting Trump was apparently the top issue of his platform in 2021.

“Bragg often reminded voters on the campaign trail that he helped sue the Trump administration ‘more than a hundred times’ as a deputy in the New York state attorney general’s office,” Reuters reported that year.

The 50-year-old prosecutor’s own supporters pointed to his ability to pursue Trump in court as a reason to back him. The New York Times reported on Bragg’s endorsement from a former U.S. attorney in July 2021.


Bragg’s record in New York, meanwhile, has been one of unleashed crime while prosecutors pursue politicized investigations against the most popular Republican in the country. In a Wall Street Journal op-ed last year, Soros admitted to backing candidates who promised to be soft on crime, branded as “reform prosecutors.” Bragg has held up to the pledge by prioritizing Trump instead of dangerous criminals. According to The New York Times, major crime spiked 22 percent during Bragg’s first year in office.


Letitia James​


James, 65, won in a partial summary judgment a year later, and in October, the trial began after the judge found the Trump family, including Trump himself, liable for fraud. The judge in the case ordered the termination of Trump’s New York business license and will now examine charges by James to determine additional penalties. In October, an appeals court put a hold on the judge’s mandate to dissolve Trump’s business in the state.

The aggressive effort against the Trump family’s New York business empire marks another campaign promise fulfilled by the state attorney general. Similar to Bragg, James ran for office in 2018 on a platform to prosecute the president. When first campaigning for the statewide job five years ago, James railed against the Republican president as “illegitimate” and an “embarrassment.”


“Letitia James fixated on Donald Trump as she campaigned for New York attorney general, branding the then-president a ‘con man’ and ‘carnival barker’ and pledging to shine a ‘bright light into every dark corner of his real estate dealings,'” the AP reported. “Five years later, James is on the verge of disrupting Trump’s real estate empire.”


Arthur Engoron​


In September, Judge Engoron devalued the former president’s Mar-a-Lago Florida estate from between $426 million and $612 million, as estimated by the Trumps, to a mere $18 and $28 million.

The stunning devaluation stands in contrast to smaller properties at Palm Beach, which sold for far more. Rush Limbaugh’s former residence, for example, sold for $155 million despite a $51 million appraisal. Mar-a-Lago, meanwhile, is the only property at Palm Beach to face the waterfront on both the ocean and the waterway.



Jack Smith​

Jack Smith, 54, a veteran prosecutor with years spent at the Justice Department, was appointed last November to lead two of the federal efforts seeking Trump’s conviction. Now special counsel in a pair of cases prosecuting Democrats’ top political opponent, Smith was previously head of the DOJ public integrity unit from 2010 to 2015. Among his most notable cases was the prosecution of former Virginia Republican Gov. Robert McDonnell, whom the Supreme Court exonerated of a bribery conviction in 2016. Smith was also involved in the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) tax scandal targeting conservative nonprofits.


Tanya Chutkan​

Smith’s team at the Justice Department could not have landed a more friendly judge in the government’s Jan. 6 case against Trump than U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan. An activist judge with an obvious animus against the former president and his supporters, the Obama appointee was assigned to preside over the politically fraught Jan. 6 case after building a reputation as “a tough punisher of Capitol rioters.”

“Other judges typically have handed down sentences that are more lenient than those requested by prosecutors,” the AP reported. “Chutkan, however, has matched or exceeded prosecutors’ recommendations in 19 of her 38 sentences. In four of those cases, prosecutors weren’t seeking any jail time at all.”


When Trump complained the federal charges against him amounted to election interference by the DOJ, Chutkan shrugged off the accusations, saying, “That’s how it has to be.” Chutkan previously condemned comparisons between the Capitol turmoil and the far-left riots that characterized the summer of 2020 in other rulings of pro-Trump demonstrators. The fiery riots, she claimed, were actually “the actions of people protesting, mostly peacefully, for civil rights.” Chutkan said comparisons between the two “ignore[] a very real danger that the Jan. 6 riot posed to the foundation of our democracy.”


Fani Willis​

Willis’ investigation of Trump and the former president’s campaign team was one of her first acts in office and will define her legacy. In August, the DA for Fulton County, which covers most of Atlanta, charged Trump with 13 counts related to the former president’s efforts to protest aspects of the 2020 election. The Georgia prosecutor also indicted 18 Trump allies, several of whom have taken plea deals. Trump adviser Jeffrey Clark, however, filed a motion on Oct. 31 to dismiss the “massive and grotesque abuse of prosecutorial power.”

A September report from The Federalist revealed Willis possesses evidence exonerating Georgia’s alternate electors but continues to pursue criminal convictions anyway.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Judge orders Trump to provide list of companies to be dissolved



As the questioning of witnesses continued this morning at former President Donald Trump trial in New York where he is accused of "numerous acts of fraud and misrepresentation" to inflate Trump's net worth while lowering his tax burden, Judge Arthur Engoron issued an order outlining the next steps to dissolve Trump's companies.

Last week, Engoron found that Trump and his adult sons used fraudulent documents to conduct business and ordered the cancellation of his business certificates. Trump appealed that ruling yesterday.

In today's order, Engoron asks the defendants to provide a list of "entities controlled or beneficially owned by Donald J. Trump" and the other co-defendants to the Hon. Barbara S. Jones, the independent monitor overseeing Trump's business activities. Trump is also required to notify Jones of any news business applications or changes to preexisting entities.

During a court conference last week, Trump's attorney Chris Kise asked Engoron for clarity about which specific entities would be impacted by the cancellation of business certificates. While Engoron declined to address the matter further during the conference, this order appears to be a step towards gaining that clarity.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member
Did Judge Kill The Trump Organization? What Fraud Ruling Means For Ex-President’s Business





Judge Arthur Engoron, in a ruling that found Trump and his company fraudulently misstated the value of their assets, canceled any certificates for businesses named in the lawsuit, as well as any other entity owned or controlled by Trump, Eric Trump, Donald Trump Jr., former CFO Allen Weisselberg (convicted on fraud charges in 2022) or Trump Organization executive Jeffrey McConney.

The limited liability companies named in the lawsuit include companies for the Trump Organization more broadly and specific properties like 40 Wall Street in New York City and the Trumps’ Seven Springs estate in Westchester County, New York.

Engoron ordered a receiver to be appointed that would oversee the companies and sell off assets in the case, though legal experts told Insider Trump would continue to own his buildings.

Former financial crimes prosecutor Diana Florence told Insider the situation is akin to a company going bankrupt, and likened losing a business license to losing a driver's license—meaning the person could still own the car, but they wouldn’t be able to do anything with it without the license to drive it.
The receiver will sell off assets and continue to take steps like paying the company’s bills until those assets are sold off, Florence said, and Trump would then receive any money that’s left over after paying the company’s debts as the Trump Organization’s beneficiary.

Engoron’s order doesn’t totally dissolve the Trump Organization overall, the New York Times noted, because the company is really a collection of smaller LLCs, and would primarily affect its operations in New York, where the case was brought.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Timcast IRL - Judge Orders Trump Organization SHUT DOWN, SHOCKING Corruption w/Carl Benjamin​



 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

What Trump's New York fraud conviction means for his business empire



New York Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron ruled Tuesday that former President Donald Trump, his two adult sons and two other Trump Organization executives committed repeated and persistent fraud by grossly inflating the value of Trump properties, allowing them to obtain dishonestly favorable terms on loans and insurance.

Engoron ordered that many of Trump's New York business licenses be revoked and the companies that own or control of some of his signature properties be placed in receivership and dissolved. If the ruling, in a civil lawsuit brought by New York Attorney General Letitia James, isn't overturned on appeal, The New York Times reported, it could shut down several Trump business entities in New York, "effectively crushing the company."

The summary judgment means that in an upcoming trial, James won't have to prove that Trump is liable for fraud. Among the "fantasy world" valuations Engoron flagged was Trump's 2,300% markup of Mar-a-Lago.
 

GURPS

INGSOC
PREMO Member

Colorado Ruling May Boost Trump as Case Heads to Supreme Court





“What the left and the media and the Democrats are doing—they’re doing all this stuff, to basically solidify support in the primary for him, get him into the general, and the whole general election is going to be all this legal stuff,” Mr. DeSantis said on Dec. 20 in Des Moines, Iowa.

The more serious impact, beyond the current election cycle, is the effect of the ruling on the electoral process, according to some observers.

“It's a constitutional crisis the likes of which we haven't seen since the Civil War,” Dave Williams, chair of the Colorado Republican Party, told The Epoch Times.

“This is something that you may have seen in the Soviet Union or in a banana republic. But it’s un-American. Absolutely, completely un-American.”

Roger Severino, a former federal prosecutor and former head of the Office of Civil Rights at the Department of Health and Human Services, told The Epoch Times: “A kangaroo court in Colorado relied on a kangaroo court in Congress to deprive the people of the right to vote for the leading presidential candidate. This outrage makes a mockery of the rule of law and the democratic system."


Biden Weighs In​


President Joe Biden declined to comment on the legitimacy of the court’s decision but said emphatically that President Trump is an “insurrectionist.”

“I think it’s self-evident. You saw it all,” President Biden told reporters in response to a question about the court decision on Dec. 20.

“Now whether the 14th Amendment applies, we’ll let the court make that decision. But he certainly supported an insurrection. There’s no question about it. None. Zero.”

A number of Democratic lawmakers affirmed the court’s decision as upholding the rule of law.

Rep. Ted Lieu (D-Calif.), who was one of the impeachment managers for President Trump's second impeachment, wrote: “Pleased the Colorado Supreme Court followed the Constitution. The Court appropriately held that Trump is disqualified from being on the ballot. As an impeachment manager, it was very clear to me that the evidence showed Trump called for and incited the mob on January 6.”

https://img.theepochtimes.com/assets/uploads/2023/12/20/id5550747-6.jpg
 
Last edited:
Top